Re: Wingfield Coats-of-Possession
The fresh Tickencote image appears to day off no less than 1650 in respect so you can webpage 3of Some Information of your own Wingfield Members of the family because of the Wingfield, John M.London: Murray, 1925 republished because of the Wingfield Loved ones Neighborhood during the 1991. ISBN0-937543-03-nine.
“Sir Robert Wyngfeld of Letheringham, their [Sir Robert whom d. ily away from half a dozen or eight sons and fivedaughters, and is also of him, with his people and you may grandchildren,just who starred zero small part in the products of the realm off England, one thepresent work [Wingfield’s publication] snacks.
Their eldest child is actually Sir John Wyngfeld out of Letheringham, Knight, exactly who, having hiswife, function the 2 central rates in the dated pedigree oil sketches whichprovide the subject of this info.
There are two main ones oictures around, almost identically similar, oneat Tickencote Hallway, Rutland, and the almost every other in the Boughton Domestic, Northants. Itis not known the brand-new and you will the copy.
Which couple try surrounded throughout the ideal and you may bottom records by the all their sixteen youngsters, inside for every circumstances Wingfield household (1) Bosville and you may (2) every quarter, Goushell in addition to chequy coat
The only from the Tickncote, today owned by Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, is actually coated towards the fabric, and also most likely already been through it given that about1650, because it’s most likely it was actually the house or property of past SirRobert Wingfield regarding Upton, when you look at the Northamptonshire, that is said to has actually diedduring the new commonwealth, and some regarding whoever petroleum illustrations was actually from the thattime got rid of so you’re able to his cousin’s house within Tickencote, when Upton try marketed, andwhich are around.”
The writer states you to definitely “the picture when you look at the Boughton house can easily be tracedback so you can 1677” (webpage 4) and offer a few statements regarding the mid 1700srefering in order to movement of one’s picture as well as presentation on Duke ofMontague.
Mcdougal states towards the page 6 one to “Whenever, otherwise because of the whose purchase, or from the just who they waspainted, has been a question not sure from the benefits.”
Again, my concerns on classification heart perhaps not within the genealogicalconnections from the players, (the latest Wingfields have been explored fairlywell, and you may even with my personal typo on the Howard family relations, I actually do have the pedigreeaccurately annotated here in RI) however, on the reason from which protects weredisplayed of the second a couple generations. I believe You will find a concept of just what”should” get on new respective protects, and you will am curious as to the reasons, in cases like this,that does not be seemingly what exactly is revealed. Often I am misleading in myunderstanding, or the Wingfield’s have been to relax and play pretty timely and shed withtheir possession for many mission hence we possibly may not yet know.
Kelly, thank you for delivering myself photo, and you can as a result of Tim for protecting me personally the trouble from placing them online. Lookin it more as well as the pedigrees when you look at the Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of Ancient Saxon Family of Wingfield_, the organization happens to be obvious in my opinion; additionally, it appears that there is that glaring heraldic mistake, inside the center, perhaps the source of your distress. I can accept We have not double-featured all the children’s impalings and i get one almost every other unanswered matter (what is the coroneted lozenge about all the way down sign in?). Brand new yellow lines apparently superimposed on this picture regarding the book aren’t like of use, as well as the annotated ‘key’ doesn’t in fact duplicate what captions and you will does not establish folk whoever arms are shown.
There’s two interesting what to the picture suggesting a few some other focuses. First, they targets a 15th-century matrimony and you will reveals the children of this wedding, however, zero later on issue. 2nd, they shows a collateral department Tjejer sexchatt that have ancestry as a result of the newest 17th century.
The brand new central panel is the wedding out-of Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) to help you Age, dau. out of Sir John Fitz Lewis and you will Anne (Montacute). The 2 rates kneel in the middle, and are surmounted because of the impalings of the parents’ palms within the wreaths. Brand new heraldic error is here now, as Sir John’s dad’s conclusion one another household and impales Gousell (in reality, Gousell quartered with this specific chequy coat). This can be an error. It is visible your quartering regarding Gousell additionally the chequy layer comes in at that time, this can not be both quartered and you can impaled regarding wreath (unless of course, by implication, Sir John whom d. 1481 got drawn an enthusiastic Oedipus and you may hitched his personal mommy). One thing I don’t admit ‘s the coroneted lozenge hanging above the people throughout the straight down sign in.